Background
  Introduction
  The Secretariat
  The Steering Board
  Honorary Members
  The Statutes
  Mandate
  Activities
Project Descriptions
  Promotional Activities
  Membership Info
  Application Form
  MEC Contact Details
  Newsletter
  AEOBiH in Media
  Press Releases
  Electoral Info
  Rules and Regulations
  Election Law
General Elections
Oct 5, 2002
Local Elections
Oct 2, 2004
  Publications
  Manual for PS Workers (local lang)
  Lessons Learned
  Conflict of Interest
  Technical Series 3
  Technical Series 2
  Technical Series 1
  Conference
  Publications
  V Annual Conference
  IV Annual Conference
  III Annual Conference
  II Annual Conference
  Mid-year Conference
  Supporting AEOBiH
  Letters
  Fundraising
   
 


 

Page 9

 

Presentation VII: Alternative Voting System by Elvedina Vrazalica, OSCE Professional Development Department. 


Dear Participants,
 

 Elvedina Vrazalica,
 OSCE Professional Development
 Department

Alternative vote, also known as the majority-preferential voting system, is a relatively unusual electoral system. Today, it is only used at a national level in Australia (for elections to the lower house), and, in a modified form, in Nauru. 

The voter is asked to indicate his/her first and alternative preferences among the candidates on a ballot. 

In order to win, a candidate must receive majority support. Where no candidate has more than 50 percent of the first preferences cast, the candidate with the lowest number of first preferences is eliminated. The ballots of the eliminated candidate are then transferred to the second preferences expressed by those voters. The process continues until a candidate receives majority support. As soon as one candidate's total first preferences plus votes transferred from defeated candidates equals more than 50 percent of the ballots cast, that candidate is declared elected. 


"...it is sometimes argued
that the preferential system
is the best system for dealing with elections in deeply divided
societies."
 

The preferential system enables supporters of candidates, who have little hope of being elected, to influence, via their second and later preferences, the election of a major candidate. For this reason, it is sometimes argued that the preferential system is the best system for dealing with elections in deeply divided societies, as it can compel candidates to seek not only the votes of their own supporters but also the "second preferences" of others. 

To attract these preferences, candidates must make broad-based, centrist appeals to all interests, and not focus on narrower sectarian or extremist issues. The experience of preferential voting in the relatively stable social environment of Australia has also tended to support these arguments. The major parties, for example, typically try to strike bargains with minor parties for the second preferences of their supporters prior to an election - a process known as "preference swapping". Furthermore, because of the majority support requirement, preferential voting increases the consent given to elected members, and thus can enhance their perceived legitimacy. 

A discussion followed the presentation and the participants mentioned the following points: 

  1. Instructions should carry simpler words and illustrations than what was the case earlier. The use of first preference and continuous use of others should be emphasized. 
  2. Instead of boxes, circles should be used on the preferential ballot for easier identification. 
  3. A list of valid and invalid ballots with all possible examples should be prepared. 
  4. Different colours should be used for different electoral levels. 
  5. It will be necessary to engage as many of the polling station members as possible in the counting process. 

For more information on preferential voting please contact the AEOBiH secretariat. Contact details on page 1.

 

 



    Home | What's New | Upcoming events | Contact Us | Links | Local Language Version