Background
  Introduction
  The Secretariat
  The Steering Board
  Honorary Members
  The Statutes
  Mandate
  Activities
Project Descriptions
  Promotional Activities
  Membership Info
  Application Form
  MEC Contact Details
  Newsletter
  AEOBiH in Media
  Press Releases
  Electoral Info
  Rules and Regulations
  Election Law
General Elections
Oct 5, 2002
Local Elections
Oct 2, 2004
  Publications
  Manual for PS Workers (local lang)
  Lessons Learned
  Conflict of Interest
  Technical Series 3
  Technical Series 2
  Technical Series 1
  Conference
  Publications
  V Annual Conference
  IV Annual Conference
  III Annual Conference
  II Annual Conference
  Mid-year Conference
  Supporting AEOBiH
  Letters
  Fundraising
   
 


Next Page

Technical Series No. 1/2001 

Page 8

 

The Preferential System

The 2000 general elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina used the preferential system for the first time. The Provisional Election Commission (PEC) introduced the system for the election of the President and Vice-President of Republika Srpska.

On the preferential ballot for the elections, all the registered candidates' names for the President and Vice-President were displayed. The following section examines how the system works and how the final result is calculated.

A voter marks the ballot by writing the number 1 opposite the name of the candidate whom the voter chooses as her/his first preference. If the voter wishes to express subsequent preferences, she/he may do so by writing the numbers 2, 3, 4, etc. opposite the names of the other remaining candidates. The voters may give as many preferences as they wish, but no more preferences than there are candidates on the ballot.

When the votes are counted, the ballots are first sorted by the first preferences marked by the voters. A candidate needs more than 50% first preferences (1) to be elected. If no candidate receives more than 50% first preferences, the candidate with the lowest number of first preferences is eliminated from the count and her/his votes are re-distributed according to second preference votes to other candidates indicated on the ballots. If, again, no candidate receives more than 50%, the procedure will be repeated until one candidate obtains more than 50%.

By using the opportunity to mark more than one candidate, the voter can influence the outcome of the election with his/her second, third, or higher choice by the transfer of the remaining preferences in the case that his/her first choice is eliminated. When more than just the first preference votes are taken into consideration, the moderate candidates stand a better chance of winning the elections, as they will have greater support from a larger cross-section of the electorate. Extreme or radical candidates have less chance to win the elections.

In the example, thirty votes are cast:

Total preferences
Candidate A
Candidate B
Candidate C
Candidate D
Candidate E
First
10
6
5
4
5
Second
2
7
5
7
7
Third
3
3
6
4
5
Fourth
2
3
4
5
1
Fifth
3
2
0
3
5

 

After the first round, none of the candidates received more than 50%. Therefore, candidate D is eliminated because he/she received the smallest number of first preferences (4).


Transfer of second preferences from Candidate D
Candidate A
Candidate B
Candidate C
Candidate E
Votes without second preferences
First round
0
0
0
2
2
Total after first transfer
10
6
5
7
28 valid votes

After the second round of counting, candidate C is eliminated.

Transfer of second preferences from Candidate C
Candidate A
Candidate B
Candidate E
Votes without second preferences
Second round
0
1
3
1
Total after second transfer
10
7
10
27 valid votes


After the third round of counting, candidate B is eliminated.

 

Transfer of second preferences from Candidate B
Candidate A
Candidate E
Votes without second preferences
Third round
1
4
2
Total after third transfer
11
14
25 valid votes


Candidate E is a winner because he/she won 56% (14 out of 25 valid votes) of preferences after three rounds of vote transfers from eliminated candidates. At the beginning, candidate E had just five first preferences, but after the third transfer he/she had accumulated fourteen.

From this example, it is possible to see the importance of being supported by large number of voters, either by their first preferences or by their second, third, and subsequent preferences. Voters do have influence on the final result even if their first choice does not win, because their second or third may win in the end.

One could consider candidate A an extremist. In spite of getting 30% support in the first round, he/she was not elected. Candidate E had only 16.7 % of support in the first round, but the preferential system's transfer of votes led to his/her victory.

It should, however, be mentioned that many elections experts doubt whether preferential voting will promote conciliatory behavior in deeply divided societies where ethnic groups are concentrated in particular geographic regions. Obviously, the politicians' incentives to seek endorsement from various groups depend on these groups' existence and size.

In the 2000 general elections, there were six political parties running for the offices of the President and Vice-President of the RS: SDS - Srpska Demokratska Stranka; PDPRS - Partija Demokratskog Progresa RS Republika Srpska; SNSD- Stranka Neovisnih Socijaldemokrata (Milorad Dodik); GDS - Gradjanska Demokratska Stranka; SDP BiH - Socijaldemokratska Partija BiH; and BOSS- Bosanska Stranka.

TABLE 6: RS Presidential Elections
(source: Official Gazette of BiH, Year IV - No. 30)

No. of eligible voters
1,104,969
No. of eligible voters participating
676,989(61,27%)
No. of invalid ballots (blank)
17,853(2,64 %)
No. of invalid ballots (wrong marking)
30,693(4,53 %)
No. of valid ballots
628,443

The winning candidate had to receive more than 50% of the votes, or 314,222 votes. After counting the first preferences, the results were the following:

Table 7: Votes / RS Presidential Elections
(source: Official Gazette of BiH, Year IV - No. 30)

  First preference Percentage %
SDS candidates
313,242
49.8%
SNSD candidates
161,407
25.7%


The party with the smallest number of first preferences was BOSS with 12,851 first preference votes. After counting the second preferences in the first transfer, it was determined that 3,924 voters whose first preference was the candidate of BOSS did not give the second preference to any candidate; therefore, the total number of the of votes after the first transfer was 624,519 and the needed number for electing the president/vice-president at that point was 312,259,5. Counted votes after the first transfer showed that SDS and their candidates won with 313,277 votes or 50.2%.

Mirko Sarovic was elected President and Dragan Cavic was elected Vice-President of the Republika Srpska. After transfer of the second preference, SNSD candidate Milorad Dodik had won 161,619 votes or 25.9%.

The total number of transferred second preferences in first transfer was 8,927 and the second preferences were distributed as SDS 35, PDPRS 41, SNSD 212, GDS 5,220, and SDPBiH 3,419.

 


 

Next Page

    Home | What's New | Upcoming events | Contact Us | Links | Local Language Version